spatial experience: self assessment.

i... don't know what to think about spatial experience. i've really struggled to wrap my mind around trying to figure out even what kind of thinking it requires from me, if that makes sense. it's as though i'm not quite certain how to frame the problem to begin to figure out how to answer it (which sounds a little melodramatic, but not entirely incorrect).

michael and i had a successful and fairly well-balanced partnership for the first project, beginning with an exciting and outlandish concept and then working hard to justify its artful impracticality across a wide breadth of installations and purposes. it was very much a learning experience, particularly the process of 'programming the space,' a task that seemed to endlessly telescope in and out of distance and complexity. the limitation of a single scenario helped tremendously in alleviating the overwhelming nature of determining every piece of wayfinding in and around every building on campus, reducing it to a representative few.

now, i'm excited to be working with abby carr for the first time, on an interesting lens through which to view dieter rams's ten principles of good design in an exhibition space.

week six: wireframes

this week has been wireframing. i didn't get as much done as i would have liked (all of it completed would have been preferable) but i have this scenario wireframed which includes the registration with the community, so the others should be much shorter. 

the following scenario looks at two different people and how they connect. this starts with isabel, my first persona, who is about to go off to college far away from her boyfriend. she happens upon the apart together website, the homepage of which is a daily survey question about users' relationships. these may be factual/numerical or more poetic (how often do you call vs. what would be your perfect future?) but also allows for the possibility of collecting and displaying statistical data. a new user trying to answer one of the questions is prompted to sign up.

isabel signs up.

she's asked to provide basic information about herself and her relationship so that she can be searched and matched with people with similar experiences, should she so desire. this information will populate her profile.

after providing her profile content, she is presented with some basic links to either set up her account or jump in to using the site.

she joined the site to ask questions and get advice, so she asks a question. a post is automatically tagged as a question if it contains a question mark, and keywords are pulled into the tags as well. isabel could add other tags of her own, if she wants. she can also list what feelings she associates with her question, which help her post find its place in a mood-map, an extra way of navigating content.

isabel's scenario is over. she closes her laptop and goes to bed after posting her question.

next, we have maggie, an established user. she signs on and is presented with the day's questions.

declining to answer at the moment, she goes to the stream, which displays all the recent content (stories, questions, advice, mixtape playlists, photos, videos...) in tiles or in a list. she sees a question from a little while ago about high school sweethearts, something she feels like she knows a lot about.

maggie has the option of responding to the question in text, attaching a song through spotify, loving the post, or viewing related posts. she clicks isabel's photo to visit her profile instead.

the profile has a place for a single profile image as well as an image of the couple. information appears about both the user and their relationship. the posts and answers they have added show up. maggie has the option to simply message her, or offer to mentor her, as isabel indicated that was something she wanted when she was signing up.

maggie offers to help support izzie through the rough transition of college and keep in touch, offering advice and her own experience to somebody who wants it.

spatial: concepting and programming.

concept:

abby carr and i brainstormed on this for quite a while. we wanted to come up with something really original and unique to relate to dieter rams' 10 principles for good design, so we started throwing out ideas. 

one thing led to another, and all of a sudden we were talking about sex toys. i know, right? it started off as a joke, but the longer we talked about it, we found ourselves more and more fascinated by the idea of artifacts designed for pleasure—not just sex toys, but things like playground equipment and children's toys. moreover, we found that there's actually quite a huge market for these well-designed "artifacts of pleasure," as we began to call them, and that most of them aligned with rams' ideas regarding participatory design and usefulness.

so, we give you... 

"artifacts of pleasure"

programming/game plan:

we spent some time working on how we want visitors to move through the space and roughly worked out what content each gallery would hold. we want this to be a really interactive and participatory experience, so we've left plenty of open space and created various opportunities for movement and play. and yes, that is a slide.

we still have yet to work out our exact content (pending concept approval), but we're both very excited about putting a new spin on rams' 10 principles by showcasing these "artifacts of pleasure." 

week five: identity & sitemapping

a big part of what i discussed with smak, ashley, and abby during small-group critique on monday was what to call this website. here is my first list of loose thoughts and ideas around it:

"we've got this"/"we got this"

we can do a (week, month, year) [this one comes from my own experience, a recurring mantra from tearful goodbyes: 'we can do a month, a month is easy.']

hearts in two places

makes the heart grow fonder

distance survival

separation nation/separation station

patience

apartnership

smart apart

heart apart

together apart

i was pretty excited about smart apart, myself, but it didn't seem quite right. i think someone said, "why not just apart together?" and it clicked into place in my head. so that is what i moved forward with.

attributes i'm intending to convey with the mark are kindness, reassurance, and not taking itself too seriously. here are some of my initial type considerations:

then i began to see how they could fit together, and ended up pretty pleased with v.a.g. rounded.

 a simple heart pictogram pulls the negative space together and reaffirms the attributes.

i also started to establish a site-map to help me clearly understand what possibilities the user has on the site, and how they should be prioritized. 

a few new notions appear on the sitemap that came up in small-group, such as an algorithmic matching mechanism to help people find each other without searching; the idea of sharing ldr mixtapes through another app like spotify; and the notion of a mood map, that can help you navigate everyone's content spatially through positivity/negativity, high energy/low energy, etc. onward and upward!

week four: personas & scenarios.

this week, may i introduce four users (and their connections) to walk us through the scenarios i established in my presentation.

how can "mentorship" be used to encourage those who are frightened about the beginning of an LDR?
meet isabel.

isabel is about to graduate from high school. she's headed off to her first-choice school in colorado in the fall, and earlier this semester, she was thrilled… but now she's feeling a little awful and conflicted, because she sort of accidentally fell in love with her boyfriend, chris. whom she once told they could "have a nice time during senior year, but not make a big thing of it," and who is now about to head for school in iowa. she thinks they're too young to be thinking too hard about their future together, but that doesn't stop her from furtively googling "high school sweetheart" statistics in the glow of her laptop. she finds a website that serves to connect people in long distance relationships to help each other get through it, and makes a post about her situation to see if anybody who's been through the same thing has any advice for her. maggie, a junior in college, sees izzie's post and relives a bit of her own fears and doubts from that time. she reaches out and offers to be a mentor to share her experiences and learning with someone who will likely parallel them.

how can the online community help someone navigate a "rough patch" in their LDR?
meet james.

james's girlfriend kelly made a mistake from a few hundred miles away. she confessed and apologized after she went to a frat party with another guy, which in james's mind, was not a big deal, and then danced with him all night, which was kind of a deal, and then also kissed him, which was a pretty big deal. they'd never really talked about how they would handle other people, but they both know they don't feel great about how this went. unenthused about talking to his local friends about it but still hurt, he absently googles to learn about how other people deal with cheating. he comes across a long distance advice and support platform. he reads some related stories, and the multi-faceted replies they received, and decides to post his own to get another take on the situation. a handful of people warn him that one transgression often leads to another, but more people than he expected encouraged him to talk it out with kelly and give it another shot if they both still want to be together, after re-establishing clear guidelines and boundaries that they're both comfortable with.

how can interactive information design help a separated partner connect with others' experiences?
meet lucy.

lucy met her girlfriend anna online. she's an ocean away, but lucy's dad works for an airline, so it's not as bad as it could be. they may only get to spend time in person once every few months, but they find time to talk and skype almost every day, and love making mixtapes and sending letters despite the postage. but the time difference means they each have quite a bit of time when they can't talk to one another, so lucy's taken to using a long distance relationship website to read stories about other couples and share stories of her own. depending on how she's feeling, she can look at funny moments, or embarrassingly sappy cute stuff, or even sad breakups when she wants to feel grateful for what she and anna have. she especially likes the "perfect futures," where people post elaborate fantasies about the lives they wish they were living with their partners, whether they're just in the same place with sweet jobs, or famous movie stars, or on an inter-stellar journey to colonize a new planet.

how can this platform allow for both online and offline friendship and companionship?

meet sarah.

sarah has been with her boyfriend nick for a few years now, and they've gotten through basic training, and a handful of transfers and new locales. the first time they were apart, she cried for days, but she found a website to help her cope better by helping her connect with others who are dealing with similar circumstances. she made online friends with a young army wife who mentored her through those hard first separations, and has developed a healthy rhythm when nick's away, taking care of their dog, and reading books. but things are about to change again: he's being deployed in afghanistan, and he won't be home again for a long time. they spend all the time together they possibly can before he leaves, but sarah knows she's going to need backup to get through this time in her life. she uses the same ldr website that helped her before, but this time she wants to find someone close by. searching through users close to her, she finds mandy, whose boyfriend has been in afghanistan for a few months already. she reaches out to her and the two make a date for lunch a few days after nick leaves, when sarah knows she'll need somebody to talk to about it.

-
lucy's scenario in particular references the sorting of the stream of content by particular topics or feelings, which is something i've been pondering. i like the function in facebook where you begin typing something and if others have already typed the same thing, it becomes a link so that everyone who mentions it connects to the same idea. i also like the idea of hashtags, hyperlinked words or phrases that can trend daily and get everyone interested reading and writing the same kinds of content together all in a flurry... i'm envisioning the story-telling/moment-adding to cleverly read what you're typing, and offer tags and topics that match the words you're already using. here are some of those concepts.

spatial process

for the elements that remain flat from the front, we've just been constructing vector drawings of them to annotate, such as the parking and main entrance signs.

as for the traveling shapes, and the interior signs and directionals, we've been constructing examples of how they work in google sketchup to make sure the forms make dimensional sense, rather than trying to guess and draw them from one angle. again, these are just examples of how these elements will move, rather than molds that they will all mimic. 

an example of a directional hub to tell you which color to follow:

an example of a shape emerging from and re-entering the ground.

a site marker outside a building

an exterior building identifier for vanderslice

an interior wall-mounted directional piece

a bathroom location indicator

a room label

week three: presentation & audience stories

this week marked the first official, class-wide presentation of our work so far and our intentions as we move forward. 

degree project research and strategy by jessirwilson

i'm spending time at this point doing justice to the surveys i took and cataloguing people's stories. here are some emergent points i've discovered, some more surprising than others. given my sample, which are people that i know directly and through social media and who volunteered to participate in such a survey, the distance is overwhelmingly that of college. even those who have dealt with other types of distance, such as military separation, have also experienced college separation. almost everyone, military excluded, gets to see their partners around once a month. phone, texting, skype, and facebook are huge communication help, while many people also enjoy the intimacy of letters. one coping mechanism that cropped up unexpectedly was that of pets, whether one partner currently has care of the other's, or whether a pet was adopted specifically to help with the separation.

these are some of the people who've shared their stories with me, beginning with a feature narrative.